That nightmare recently happened to a clergyman who was a bishop in my town. The stunning fact is that I not only knew the man but also the woman who was killed -- a mother of three, who was out jogging on Sunday afternoon last week. I hired her a number of years ago as a police officer.
The bishop was the way to a church activity that afternoon. After striking her, he fled the scene of the accident. He was, nevertheless, apprehended by police a short time later. An accident? I am sure. But the problem with accidents is that if you leave the scene, or are intoxicated, you compound the severity. In this case, the bishop had a blood alcohol reading of .128 -- the legal limit in our state is .08. He is now charged with three felonies and, if convicted, could spend years in prison. In the meantime, a woman is dead and there is grief all around.
The bishop is well-respected and presides over 145 congregations as
leader of the South-Central Synod of the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Church in
America (ELCA). A statement was issued from the bishop's office: "We're holding
the family of the woman who was killed in our prayers and we are really
asking that God would be with them and provide them comfort in their grief and
all those who have been impacted" Click Here for the News Article
How do we make sense of this horrible tragedy? I have to say it has shaken me. Could it have been prevented? In my
experience, it is easy for those who have powerful and prestigious positions to
find themselves secretly in trouble with personal addictions, abusing power, sexual misconduct, or financial misdeeds. Prevention is difficult but not impossible. Often friends and loved ones around powerful and prestigious people often know of their often self-destructive behavior but are unable to act for a variety of reasons.
This is often occurs because as a person’s personal power and
prestige increase, accountability for their behavior seems to decrease. Can anyone of us hold powerful people we may love and admire without coming under their wrath?
I think this is where moral character (and a working spirituality) come into play. In business, government, and the church, few
people can speak truth to power. And that is an unfortunate situation in our society -- especially in the church.
I have a different take on all this. I believe it is not only the responsibility of a leader to strive for health and wellness, but also
those who work with that leader. I know, this is shaky ground, but bear with me!
It is a danger for any one of us who hold power over others not
to have a soul friend with whom we can (and will) be accountable to for our behavior -- both at home and at work. By this I mean another
person who can ask critical spiritual and wellness questions and be given a truthful answer. Let me suggest a few:
1. Tell me about your current health and wellness -- your exercise program,
and especially how you handle stress in your job and with your family?
2. Tell me about your primary relationships -- the quality of
the time you spend with your spouse, children, and closest friends? Tell me honestly, what is it like to
be in a loving relationship with you?
3. What are your personal improvement goals? Name three of them. How are you doing
in pursuing and achieving them?
4. What role does alcohol (including prescription drugs) play in
your life. How much and how often do you use them? Have any of your friends or your spouse voiced concern about your use of alcohol or other drugs? If they have, what are you
doing about it?
5. What are the temptations in your life and how do you handle them?
5. What are the temptations in your life and how do you handle them?
6. How do you handle disappointment and conflict at work and at
home? How have you handled losses in your life?
7. What is your religious and/or spiritual life like? Do you truly practice what you say you believe?
Remember, these are suggestions -- a good place to start. While it is difficult for an employee, or even a board or
commission, to have this kind of relationship with a leader, it is vitally important that leaders take the initiative to have this kind of
relationship with someone. It is what I call a "mutual accountability;"
that is, two people who can give each other a pledge of confidentiality, total honesty,
and deep openness and then do this important protective interpersonal work.
It isn't easy. And I don't know if the bishop involved in this
tragedy last week had such a relationship. But being in government and
the church for over half a century now, I will venture to say that he did not.
My prayers go out everyone who has been so horribly impacted by this event. I also pray that those who hold powerful and prestigious
positions of authority in our society are able to work through the above
questions with a trusted person.
Not to do so is risky business for all of us.
++++++++++++++
Just after posting this, the following article appeared the following day on the front page of the New York Times and is one of my major points. The first sentence reads as follows:
"After a series of scandals involving high-ranking officers, the American military for the first time will require generals and admirals to be evaluated by their peers and the people they command on qualities including personal character."
This is something I required from the leaders in my organization (police) over 30 years ago. Since that time, it has also a practice that many organizational consultants have recommended be adopted by both government and business -- not only peer evaluation but also that of subordinates.
CLICK HERE for the Article
Postscript: It was in November of 2011 that the bishop's wife died after a battle with cancer.++++++++++++++
Just after posting this, the following article appeared the following day on the front page of the New York Times and is one of my major points. The first sentence reads as follows:
"After a series of scandals involving high-ranking officers, the American military for the first time will require generals and admirals to be evaluated by their peers and the people they command on qualities including personal character."
This is something I required from the leaders in my organization (police) over 30 years ago. Since that time, it has also a practice that many organizational consultants have recommended be adopted by both government and business -- not only peer evaluation but also that of subordinates.
CLICK HERE for the Article
Very well said. My heart and my prayers go out to all those involved with this tragedy.
ReplyDeleteExcellent post, David. I will share this with leaders in the making at our seminary in Hong Kong. I am so sad for all involved.
ReplyDelete